Monday Movie Review: Sideways

Sideways (2004) 5/10
Miles (Paul Giamatti) takes his friend Jack (Thomas Haden Church) on a road trip to wine country the week before Jack’s wedding. There they meet and become involved with two beautiful wine connoisseurs (Sandra Oh and Virginia Madson).

Gods, did I hate this movie.

Okay, that’s kind of strong. There’s certainly a lot to commend. Giamatti’s performance is nuanced and rather brilliant. Madsen and Oh are radiant and sharp. There were some decent laughs, and the movie is intelligently written. For all of that, it pretty much made my skin crawl.

First, can we talk about Thomas Haden Church? He looks like the Claymation version of a handsome man. His face is soft and sort of semi-formed. I was totally on board when he was cast as the Sandman, a character who turns into sand, because he kind of looks like that all the time. It’s very distracting to watch his squishy face, which is consistent with his squishy character. It’s a child’s face, and Jack behaves like a child.

The problem with Sideways is that Miles and Jack are detestable men with barely any character arc. I’m all about dislikable characters, but give me something. Within the first fifteen minutes of the movie, Miles has lied to his friend Jack, dawdled when he was already late, and stolen from his mother. Really, by this point I absolutely despised Miles, and didn’t give a shit what his fucking character journey was. But I stuck with the movie in the hopes that things would shape up.

Silly me.

Giamatti has one absolutely stellar monologue, in which he talks about the wonders of the Pinot grape. How it’s thin-skinned, temperamental, not a survivor, but has the most brilliant and thrilling flavors if it’s grown correctly. It’s very clear that he’s describing himself, but wonderfully, neither he nor Maya (Madsen) spell out the simile; the viewer can know it without having it hammered home. The thing is, though, that Miles is thin-skinned and temperamental, but I never really bought that he was thrilling and brilliant.

A negative protagonist works when you sense there’s something good within that is unexpressed. You root for the character in the hopes that the good will come out, or that the character will survive the adventure to perhaps find that goodness at a later date. But neither Miles nor Jack evince any decent qualities at all. Miles is smug and disdainful in every conversation, he feels sorry for himself, he whines, he pontificates, and he is seething with anger. Jack is a philanderer and a big ol’ baby. Despite everything these men go through, they just persist in being their small-minded, nasty selves.

You know, when you read that, you can think it’s intelligent, or realistic, or whatever. Mostly, whiny depressive snots don’t much change. But everything in the script and presentation sets you up to expect the heartwarming moment. There is a heartwarming moment at the very end, but it’s tepid, and entirely too small in proportion to what has gone before.

Hollywood, including “indie” Hollywood, has too many goddamn movies about self-pitying middle-aged white men with delusions of intellectualism and fear of commitment. Yeah, I get it, they write what they know. But all that does is make me feel irritated that they don’t know anything else. If I met Miles or Jack at a party I’d chat with them for ten minutes and then walk away, annoyed. Instead, I was stuck with them for two hours.

18 comments

  1. Hazel says:

    Thank you.

    Two antipathetic men drinking wine and having sex with women who were far too good for them.

    Ten minutes? Two would be too much.

    Great blog, btw, I discovered it via Laughing Wild.

  2. deblipp says:

    Thanks for the validation, ladies, I needed it.

    Welcome, Hazel!

  3. Ellen-Mary says:

    I couldn’t watch the whole thing. I tried and got about half way through when I realized that I didn’t give a rat’s ass what happened to any of the characters. That eject button is a powerful little tool. The promotional trailers made the movie look promising and funny. It was neither of those things. I think your review is spot on.

  4. Zora says:

    Thanks, I hated that movie too for all the same reasons.

    The men I saw it with, naturally, loved it. It had such great reviews; it was supposed to be so cutting edge, but it was the same old-white man hooks up with younger hottie bullshit that’s spread across Hollywood.

  5. Amy says:

    Thank God. I hated this movie and I never get any validation for it. It’s disgusting.

  6. treecat says:

    Yay, I’m so glad to see that I’m not alone in this. Stupid movie got so much praise and I thought it was just painfully boringly disgustingly awful. Like I’d hate the characters, but they aren’t even worth that much energy! Self-absorbed stuck-up slime eeccchh.

  7. deblipp says:

    Wow, seems like I hit a nerve.

  8. Roberta says:

    Al hated it too.

  9. deblipp says:

    One more reason we love Al.

    I posted this elsewhere and 100% of the defense of and love for this movie came from men. Just sayin’.

  10. Barbs says:

    I like like the part where Sandra Oh beats the crap out of Haden

  11. Ben says:

    I’m just sitting here thinking about women I’ve known who loved Pretty Woman, a film with a message of: A woman is a whore till a rich man validates her.

    Did you post this review somewhere besides here and If I Ran The Zoo? Because there, the “100%” was exactly one guy.

  12. deblipp says:

    I’m just sitting here thinking about women I’ve known who loved Pretty Woman, a film with a message of: A woman is a whore till a rich man validates her.

    Which is a complete non-sequitur; the only thing the two movies have in common is that the characters have gender.

    Did you post this review somewhere besides here and If I Ran The Zoo? Because there, the “100%” was exactly one guy.

    Yes, of course I did, how dishonest do you take me for?

    And it was two guys at IIRTZ, actually, since George linked to another review.

  13. Melville says:

    And it was two guys at IIRTZ, actually, since George linked to another review.

    It’s 3 guys now. Generik likes it, I don’t.

  14. Ken says:

    I watched it for about 10 minutes, decided I wasn’t interested at the time, and never went back. I love all the actors in this movie, but I just couldn’t get interested……

  15. Cosette says:

    Yah, the best part of the movie is when Sandra Oh beats the *!#t out of claymation boy. Hated it. I stuck with it, hoping for a redeeming ending, liked Madsen and Oh, but oh! Those pitiful, whiny boys! And it won an Oscar?!

  16. Peg says:

    I actually love this movie. In part, becauseit seems to have some cool pagan imagery and themes happening. I think is a very interesting (if subtle) suggestion that the two characters are representations of Christ and Pan. Guess which one is which?

    I mean, when Miles dances/runs through the vineyard on nimble goatfeet? and guzzles the bucket of wine-spittle? And simple Jack, in his flowy linen shirts, is worshipped by everyone he meets? I dunno, I think it’s there.

    Then there’s Maya, the, um, earthy one, ha ha. I love her speech on why she likes wine.

  17. deblipp says:

    Peg, that’s a fascinating take on it.