From Russia With Love (1963) 10/10
In his second on-screen mission, James Bond (Sean Connery) believes he is helping a lovestruck Russian agent (Daniela Bianchi) defect. In fact, both sides are being manipulated by SPECTRE.
In The Ultimate James Bond Fan Book, I rate From Russia With Love as my #1 James Bond movie, and review it extensively. But this is different. I had the opportunity to see this wonderful movie on the big screen at the New York Film Forum.
What I knew when I decided to go was that (a) this is my favorite Bond film, (b) I’d never seen it on the big screen, and (c) it was playing on my birthday, so fab treat for me. What I realized when I sat down was that I hadn’t seen it at all in over a year, maybe two, and that it had been even longer since I’d sat down with it just for pleasure; not to take notes or double-check something in slo-mo (perils of being an author). It was the first time in years I’d seen it just as a movie, not as a Bond movie, in the context of the entire Bond franchise. So I felt very thrilled, sitting there in the tiny Film Forum theater, with a not-really-huge screen and an extraordinarily enthusiastic audience.
The audience is definitely part of the fun. It’s a combination of hardcore film fans and people who are just taking advantage of the wonderful variety offered by living in New York City. Few, though, appeared to be hardcore Bond fans (although I met up with fellow Bond fans “LeiterCIA” and “Cooper”). Arriving early and listening to the audience chatter, it was clear that many in the audience had never seen the film, or had seen it long ago, or had seen only bits and pieces on TV. So this was a fresh, unjaded audience, with fresh, genuine reactions. They laughed, gasped, and applauded.
What a magnificent film FRWL is! So easy to forget when you get thoroughly absorbed in the whole Bond “world,” how perfect, how stand-alone, the best ones are. FRWL is brilliantly constructed. There are some minor plot flaws to be sure, but it flows beautifully, so that a complex, intricate plot is clear and easy to follow. I was struck by the way in which every scene had a clear, readable establishing shot. You always know exactly where you are. That is so rare nowadays. The narrative clarity was excellent, and given that this is a story with a mysterious hidden villain, several henchmen with distinct and bizarre characters, Russian defections and fake defections, a “murder island,” a secret SPECTRE agent following a Bulgar killer who is following a Turkish spy who is protecting a British agent…well, without narrative clarity, you’re doomed.
The theatrical experience brings enormous pleasures. Things that are very subtle on TV—like Rosa Klebb (Lotte Lenya) copping a feel of Tatiana Romanova (Bianchi) are very obvious at full size (the audience laughed when Klebb stroked Tanya’s knee). The beauty of the film is fully-realized. The North By Northwest homage sequence; Bond being chased over hills by a helicopter that is dropping grenades at him, is a masterpiece of dizzying camera work.
And the characters! FRWL is all about the characters, and somehow they’re even better when larger-than-life. Kronsteen, evil chessmaster, got big laughs from the audience, who loved his creepy, expressive face. Pedro Armandariz is always a crowd-pleaser, and how can you not love the expansive and delighted-by-life Kerim Bey?
From Russia With Love is a 10/10 movie. After seeing it on the big screen, it moved up to a better, bigger, shinier 10/10. If you ever get a chance to see vintage Bond on the big screen, Go-Go-Go!
Well, I saw this cross-posted at If I Ran the Zoo, but I’m the only one who seemed to notice it. I’ll just do a reverse cross-post (is that a new move???), albeit cleaned up a little (preview is my friend…):
FRWL is my very favorite Bond movie, the one that is the closest to what I consider the only realistic spy movie of the Bond series. They have some fancy gizmos, but a lot of what gets done is old shoe leather stuff. My favorite part is when they use the sewer system to eavesdrop on the Russians.
Lots of great moments in this one, and, like you said, great establishing shots. You don’t need a caption at the bottom saying, “Venice,” or “Istanbul.” You know where the film “is,” just from one good shot.
I’d seen FRWL again very recently, on DVD, and felt like I’d enjoyed a five-star dinner with an old friend. I can only imagine what it would be like to see it on the big screen. Maybe the equivalent of having Wolfgang Puck drop by to make a dream dinner.
Thanks for your comments, LJ, very insightful.
Lord knows that I love FRWL. I think that it’s one of the best Bond movies I have ever seen. And it features Connery’s best performance as Bond. However . . . I found it rather flawed in the movie’s last half hour or so.
One, Grant should have killed Bond, while the latter was still unconscious, instead of taking his time to put on his gloves before committing his murders. Rather stupid of him. Two, I don’t think that both a helicopter chase reminscent of a Hitchcock movie and a boat chase in the Adriatic Sea were both needed before Bond’s showdown with Klebb in Venice. I thought that was a bit too much. And Connery seemed to be spouting puns, one right after the other during that last half hour.
Other than that, FRWL was superb.
Connery has always been my favorite Bond. I’ll rewatch his versions whenever TV has them on. In between showings, I go grab the books. (Given Hollywood’s treatment of source material such as books, practically rewriting them from scratch and only keeping the title, it’s like getting 2 Bonds for 1! =)