Monday Movie Review: Ushpizin

Ushpizin (2004) 8/10
Moshe (Shuli Rand) and Malli (Michal Bat-Sheva Rand) are ultra-Orthodox Jews living in Jerusalem. Moshe is so broke that he cannot afford to prepare for the upcoming holiday of Sukkot. Praying for a miracle, he receives unexpected help. He also receives usphizin, holiday guests, which are considered a blessing, but these particular guests are not what anyone expected.

Shuli Rand was a popular Israeli actor who quit to live a religious life. He came back to acting for this movie only, which he also wrote, and the Israeli Film Academy awarded him with Best Actor for this film. As such, it is respectful of religious life, not gawky, but also not idealistic. The Jews of Moshe’s neighborhood are deeply religious, but also argumentative and judgmental.

Moshe is a guy with a past, and his past is catching up with him. At one time a violent criminal, he longs for redemption. He and Malli also long for children, and the lack of this blessing is seen by them as a failing of faith. When an escaped con from Moshe’s past shows up as a guest, Moshe is confronted by his own weakness, his desire to lie and be rid of these guests, warring within himself (and within his marriage) with his desire for piety and an open, welcoming heart.

The criminal guests are gently comic; they have no understanding of who these religious people are. Which works on several levels, putting the American viewer on equal footing. They continue to shake up the movie, and as much as these guys are jerks, we end up with a certain affection for them. Certainly they bring color to the screen.

Malli is a great character. Rand insisted that his wife be cast in this role, and their natural affection for each other works. She is strong, opinionated, devoted, and funny. I am charmed by seeing a heavier woman in this role, there are two few big women in the movies. It’s especially notable because she is childless; the ghetto for heavy women tends to be Earth Mother.

So what are the themes here? Certainly miracles and prayer are important, escaping the past and living a good life. But I think we’re also talking about anger. Moshe and Malli get angry at these rude, obnoxious guests. Eliyahu (Shaul Mizrahi—nominated for Best Supporting Actor for this film by the Israeli Film Academy) is angry that his old friend has changed. Malli is angry at Moshe, who has deceived her. Their anger is intense, and inevitable, and prevents each of them from doing what they truly wish to do.

I liked the bird’s eye view of an enclave we rarely see in films. I liked these people, their passionate commitment to their lives and their deep feeling, I liked the joyfulness of their faith and the richness of their despair, and I loved their ability to laugh at themselves.

I’m going to quote House

…or paraphrase, anyway:

That feeling of awkwardness is nature’s way of telling us we shouldn’t talk about it.

Cracks my shit up. Totally wrong-headed, but totally perfect.

Mother denied custody because of Wicca

Every time I hear one of these stories, it’s a fresh, new horror.

Did talk of a mother’s (alleged) adherence to Wicca cause her to lose custody of her child? That is the allegation of Andrea Hicks, who said that Chicot County Circuit Judge Robert Vittitow improperly considered her religious views in his ruling.

“In her appeal of Chicot County Circuit Judge Robert Vittitow’s decision, the mother noted Vittitow described Wicca in his opinion letter as ‘a religion, movement, cult or whatever it that may be.’ The judge also wrote that while the mother testified she was only joking when she told the boy’s father that she was involved with Wicca, the ‘court believes she is much more involved than she would lead us to believe.'”

Hicks’ first appeal was denied, even though the two dissenting judges believed that the ruling ‘impermissibly considered’ her faith. You can read the opinions of the judges on the appeal court, here (Andrea Hicks v. Joshua A. Cook). Now, somewhat unsurprisingly, a motion to rehear the appeal has been denied with the same justices dissenting.

I would ask anyone reading this to cross-post it. Widespread attention is one of the few things that helps in cases like this.

Soup of the Day

The other day, my throat was a little sore, so I decided on Boston Market for lunch. Now, if you don’t have Boston Market where you live, let me explain that it’s basically fast comfort food. Nothing is fried. Main courses are roast chicken, meatloaf, and ham. Sides are creamed spinach, mashed potatoes, macs & cheese, stuffing, mixed veggies, and the like. Comfort food. On a cold or clammy day, I love going there.

Now, sometimes they have one soup and sometimes two. They’ll rotate in a special, like most fast food joints. And my throat was sore, so I wanted soup.

I go to the girl and I ask “What’s the soup today?”

She points and says “That one.”

Fail.

Tuesday Trivia: All Solved

That was tough!

» Read more..

Surveyors are interesting

I work less than a quarter mile from the state line, so there are surveyors. You drive past. They’re measuring and whatever.

Until I worked here, I had seen surveyors maybe twice in my life.

They’re interesting.

Hey I added hints (corrected)

Or, y’know, hint.

Okay, I only saw that one question needed a hint before. That question was solved, but I’ve added a hint for the other unsolved question.

Tuesday Trivia: Random stuff

1. A British woman and an American man, while dancing, discuss constipation.
Solved by Pax (comment #17).

2. He wants to marry his true love, a deaf woman, but he gets another woman pregnant and does “what is expected.”
Hint: This is the second time directing for a renowned actor who has appeared in small, character roles in both films. The two films were made 13 years apart.
Solved by Hogan (comment #21).

3. This adaptation of a theatrical play is very similar to the original, and is adapted for the screen by the playwright. The exception is a new scene was written for the movie, featuring a character who was written specifically for the actor who played him.
Solved by Trevor J (comment #4).

4. A female athlete is criticized for her uni-brow.
Solved by Hogan (comment #19).

5. Actors appearing as themselves in this movie include Julia Roberts, Harry Belafonte, Gary Busey, John Cusack, Peter Falk, and Louise Fletcher.
Solved by Melville (comment #3).

6. “You make love as you eat, with a great deal of noise and no subtlety.”
Solved by Hogan (comment #12).

7. He takes his friend’s wife to visit him at the sanitarium, and gets her pregnant on the way back.
Hint: Recently remade, starring an actor who was also in another recent remake of the original star’s work. The other recent remake featured the original actor in a different role.
Solved by Melville (comment #24).

Monday Movie Review: Quantum of Solace

Quantum of Solace (2008) 6/10
James Bond (Daniel Craig), having shot Mr. White (Jesper Christensen) at the end of Casino Royale, interrogates him and learns of a secret organization known as Quantum. Following sparse leads, Bond finds Dominic Greene (Mathieu Amalric) and pursues him to the Bolivian desert. Directed by Marc Forster.

The other day I was interviewed by E! Online and I defended Bond against the notion that he’s losing ground to, or imitative of, Jason Bourne. And now I have to say that the first ten or fifteen minutes of Quantum of Solace are indistinguishable from The Bourne Ultimatum.

I don’t know, I am inclined to blame Marc Forster. He’s an artful director who has never done action before, so naturally he’d imitate an artful action director. But for Bond, it doesn’t work. Bond movies have strong narrative flow, and the crazy-quick-cut approach just doesn’t do it.

A lot of Quantum of Solace felt like someone else’s movie. Someone else’s soundtrack. Someone else’s title song. Someone else’s title design. It made me want to watch a Bond movie.

Not that this wasn’t a good movie; it was. It wasn’t a great movie, and it was too short, too snappy, and too confusing. But it was good. There were beautiful touches, and Marc Forster’s eye for framing a shot was very apparent. This may be the finest composition you’ll see in a Bond film. There were lovely visual homages; the Goldfinger one being the most obvious, but The Spy Who Loved Me is there as well, and just prior to the climactic battle, a lovely visual and plot reference to the short story For Your Eyes Only. (You can’t miss it.)

So much is going on that it’s hard to describe; a villain with a complex plot, a huge, shady organization behind him (but not a part of his plot so much; I suspect a SPECTRE-like organization with many fingers in many pies, a conglomerate), the CIA (and hello, Leiter), Bond’s hunt for revenge for Vesper, Camille (Olga Kurlyenko) with her own revenge motives and her own sub-plot, motivation, and secondary characters—I’m getting tired just listing it all. And, while the plot may not be as complex as Octopussy, it may take me longer to figure out, because it all goes by so fast.

So now I’ve had the night out at the movies I’ve been anticipating for two years. I’m tired, I’m a little let down. I think most people will love this movie, and I think it’s natural for the hardcore fan to be pickier. I feel like I’ll like this movie better on DVD, when I can slow down a little, back away a little, and replay lines that go by too fast.

(Cross-posted)

The Return of Friday Catblogging!

<small><strong>Luggage? What luggage? You mean my cat bed?</strong></small>

Luggage? What luggage? You mean my cat bed?

After getting back from Florida, I hurt my back, and so I haven’t finished unpacking. Mingo loves this suitcase. Loves it. Snuffs it. Sticks his head in. Sticks his body in. Lays on it. Sharpens his claws on it.

So at 5am when nature called, I nearly tripped over this little scene, and somehow thought to grab the camera. Took the picture in the dark and only saw afterwards that it came out cute as pie.