Monday Movie Review: The Warriors

The Warriors (1979) 7/10
At a meeting of all New York gangs, the respected organizer is murdered and The Warriors wrongfully accused. Now, unarmed, they’ve got to get from the Bronx to their home turf in Coney Island—the entire length of the city—with every gang in New York after them.

Warriors…come out and plaaaaay-aay!

So here’s the thing. There’s this famously obscure movie made in 1979 about New York gangs, kind of cult/sleeper. And I thought I’d seen it until a friend of mine started using the above quote as a sig line, and said it was from The Warriors. I didn’t know that line.

Turned out I’d seen The Wanderers. I hate when that happens.

So I finally caught up with The Warriors. It’s a dark vision of a nightmare New York in which the gangs wander the streets in scary clown makeup, bright colors from costume shops made dark by the accompanying weapons and the total incongruity. The “Baseball Furies” wear Yankee pinstripes and full-face makeup and carry baseball bats. The “Punks” wear overalls and rollerskates. The Warriors themselves are relatively conservative in decorated leather vests, but the overall effect is still of swatches of terrifying color, painted like graffiti across city life.

The acting here runs the gamut from very bad to a little bit bad, and some of the events are incredibly stupid. It’s a little difficult to remember that, for the majority of the movie, most of The Warriors don’t realize that there’s a coordinated call out to go after them, so that they wander blankly into traps.

But it doesn’t matter. There’s a raw energy that drives the film forward, and a sense of unreality to the location shooting. New York, filmed in a particular way, and particularly at this period of time, can look like a dystopic science fiction set, like it really is Beneath the Planet of the Apes in the cavernous subways. The Warriors captures that heightened sensibility, the way raw reality feels dreamlike.

It’s not surprising to learn that The Warriors is based on an ancient Greek tale. It works as a mythical journey, bringing the young gang members face to face with themselves as they travel the long (over 32 miles) way on foot and by subway. Along the way they will be challenged, humiliated, tempted, and pursued.

For new readers, here’s a reminder about how I use my rating scale:
10 or 9: A must-see. I judge a film for what it is, so a great heist movie can get a 10 for being great, even if it isn’t a movie of Transcendent Importance.
8 or 7: See it, but flawed.
6 or 5: Maybe see it if it appeals to you. Definitely flawed or very inconsistent.
4 or 3: Don’t see it.
2 or 1: You’ll hate yourself if you see it. There may be sickness.

Sunday Meditation: Preparing a Mixed-use Altar

Last week, I talked a little about using an altar for meditation, and having a mixed-use prayer/meditation altar.

Creating this altar can itself be meditative. Before choosing each element, take a deep breath, still your thoughts, and allow yourself to focus fully on the task of creating this altar.

What are some practical considerations?

It should be in a location where it is physically accessible for you. I had an altar I knelt at, and I had to rearrange everything after my knee injury made kneeling inaccessible. It should also be in a location that is easy to keep clean.

Some people like austere, simple altars, and some like a huge array of sensory stimuli. These are personal choices. Be sure you have everything you need at hand. If you prefer an austere look, then a drawer or storage box is helpful. You’ll want candles, incense, incense holder, and matches. You may want crystals or stones or other meditation objects, a rosary, a book of prayers or meditations, and perhaps symbols of the four elements.

Because this is a prayer space, you will want an idol or representative of the deity to whom you pray. This may be a devotional altar to a specific deity, but because it is a mixed-use space, you should be able to move things around, to move your focus for that prayer or that meditation before you.

My altar

This is my prayer altar. You’ll notice right away I like the cluttered look. It is primarily a Kali altar, and you can see that She has central position, many symbols, and many things that belong to Her. But you’ll also see Bast represented (lower right)—I added Her when my cat went missing. There’s a tiny little spot of red in the lower left, which is actually Radha’s skirt; the “love” portion of my altar didn’t fit in the frame.

Thing is, when I’m focused on Bast or on love, I can move things around. If I need to pray to Shiva, I can bring Him forward. The black mirror that serves as a base to my altar pulls focus, so whatever I move on and off the mirror determines my meditation or prayer subject.

This altar is on my dresser. I can stand comfortably, and I can pull up a rocking chair. I have different types and colors of candles, and the red box that Shiva is on top of has additional supplies in it.

All this clutter tends to get dusty, but cleaning the altar is itself a meditation.


Brigid’s Day: Virtual Poetry Reading

Here’s my second annual entry in the Virtual Poetry Reading for Brigid’s Day.

Please feel free to enter your own favorite poem in comments.

Winter Promises

Tomatoes rosy as perfect baby’s buttocks,
eggplants glossy as waxed fenders,
purple neon flawless glistening
peppers, pole beans fecund and fast
growing as Jack’s Viagra-sped stalk,
big as truck tire zinnias that mildew
will never wilt, roses weighing down
a bush never touched by black spot,
brave little fruit trees shouldering up
their spotless ornaments of glass fruit:

I lie on the couch under a blanket
of seed catalogs ordering far
too much. Sleet slides down
the windows, a wind edged
with ice knifes through every crack.
Lie to me, sweet garden-mongers:
I want to believe every promise,
to trust in five pound tomatoes
and dahlias brighter than the sun
that was eaten by frost last week.

Marge Piercy


How well do you know the Internet?

Have fun with the stupid quiz while I drown in my overwhelming life:

Site of the Week

I have mentioned before that my sister and I have a Mad Men blog. Nice little sideline? NOPE! We are AMC’s Mad Men Site of the Week.

Yay us!

Damn it!

John Edwards is dropping out.

Yeah, I know. Underdog. No chance. But Edwards was more eloquent on poverty, more dignified and honest, had the best healthcare plan, didn’t pander, and was more gracious when wrong.

I’m from New Jersey. New Jersey’s primary used to be in June. June! For all my life I never got to vote for my candidate of choice, because he’d always dropped out by June. I’ve never been able to cast a vote for a true progressive, because by June all that’s left is the moderate centrist mealy-mouthed compromise candidate. Then I moved to New York, and yippee skip, I got to vote for Bill Bradley like the week before he dropped out.

I just want to cast my vote, GODDAMN IT.

A little more about Juno

Apparently, Juno is all controversial. It’s unkind to people who were adopted as well as to birth mothers to create a comedy about adoption. There’s a lot of discussion about whether Juno is anti-choice.

Shut! Up!

This is where I part ways with many feminists and other activists; where they start criticizing or trying to restrict art based on content. It’s not better to object to a movie based on its supposed anti-choice values than it is to object to a movie based on its supposed liberal values. It all feels like Social Realism thinking to me. I get that a birth mother might not want to see Juno, and might find it painful. And I sympathize. But that doesn’t mean that the subject matter should be off-limits. There are definitely things I never want to see in movies, and movies I avoid as a result. Comedies that everyone loves that I’ve never seen because they feel like they would trigger some serious pain for me.

But that doesn’t mean those comedies shouldn’t be made, nor that they are “not funny” by some objective standard. There is no objectivity with humor.

The more touchy the subject, the harder to do it right. One of my problems with Waitress, which was basically very charming, was the attempt to have a humorous abusive husband. This wasn’t triggering for me; I’ve never been the victim of domestic violence, but it made me uncomfortable.

I didn’t come away from that movie thinking this subject should never be addressed in a comedy. I came away thinking that maybe it can’t be done well, and this movie definitely didn’t do it well. But who knows? If beautifully written and acted, maybe it could illuminate the characters without feeling way out of line. Maybe.

If so, some people will choose to skip that movie anyway, because it hurts too much, and it’s not funny for them. I get that. I just don’t feel like it should be censored in advance, and I don’t feel that people who do find it funny should be accused of being less enlightened or feminist or socially responsible than thou.

D Trivia: All Solved

Great job, everyone.

» Read more..

Men’s Figure Skating: Holy Mother of God!

If you follow figure skating, you probably already know this. If you just watch the Olympics every four years, not so much. I follow the Nationals and such when I can, but not avidly. I love it but I make little time in my life for sports.

So the U.S. Figure Skating Nationals were this weekend. I watched part on Saturday and DVRed the rest. I watched the rest of Saturday (dance and women’s) on Sunday and Sunday (men’s) last night.

Holy shit.

The two top American male skaters were both in the last Winter Olympics, so if you’re an every-four-years fan, you may remember them; they are Johnny Weir and Evan Lysacek. They could not be more opposite. Weir is small, artsy, and fey. He performs complex choreography laden with symbolism, and wears weird sparkly costumes that are also symbolic. When he skates well, he has ease and grace and you feel centered just to watch him. Often enough, he skates poorly or inconsistently, like a brat, and he has called himself a “princess” and a “bitch.”

Lysacek is tall and masculine. His costumes are of the pants-and-shirt variety. Men’s skating is very gay, and Lysacek probably is as well (although, y’know, we haven’t dated) but he’s kind of a top. His skating is dramatic and forceful, with straightline footwork that feels like you’ve been attacked by a mad flamenco dancer. But in a good way. He’s a balls-to-the-wall skater who pulled out a fab long program in Turino after a round of IV fluids.

So naturally, NBC was playing up the rivalry between the two. And even though the reporters are dorky, the competition was thrilling and the skating quality was amazing.

And then something happened I’ve never seen: Something no one has ever seen.

Weir and Lysacek tied.

Tied.

Each earned exactly 244.77 points. Lysacek got the gold, because the rule book says that in a tie, the higher-scoring long program wins. I have no idea what happens if both individual skates tie!

Tied.

The two athletes were stunned. They didn’t know how to take it. And I, who disdain most sports, started screaming Oh! My! God! rather loudly.

Oh. My. God.

Tuesday Trivia: Movies Beginning with the letter D

Because I feel like it.

1. The scientists decide the cafe owner is okay because she refuses to keep coffee in the freezer.
Solved by Ken (comment #12).

2. A character in this movie has rings that mimic tattoos from a 1955 movie. These tattoos are also mimicked in a 1975 movie.
Solved by Melville (comment #1).

3. “I don’t think you fully understand, _______. You’ve been murdered.”
Solved by Evn (comment #11).

4. Person 1: “So what country do you want to go to?”
Person 2: “Wyoming.”
Person 1: “___, Wyoming’s not a country.”
Solved by Melville (comment #1).

5. Based on a famous book with a cult following and numerous sequels. Critically-acclaimed director. Rock star as one of the villains. Bad movie.
Solved by Roberta (comment #3).

6. “I never gave a ticket to a nun before. I gave a ticket to a guy from the IRS one time.”
Solved by Anthony Cartouche (comment #10).

7. Neither Humphrey Bogart nor Ronald Reagan get the girl.
Solved by Melville (comment #1).