Tuesday Trivia: Orgasms

1. A woman has an orgasm in the act of performing for a man who doesn’t notice because he is watching TV.
Solved by Roberta (comment #3).

2. A woman has an orgasm when excited by a man who doesn’t notice because he is innocent and interested only in flying.
Solved by Ben (comment #5).

3. A woman has a fake orgasm in public.
Solved by Evn (comment #1).

4. A teenage girl slips out of an open dorm room to masturbate to orgasm in the hall.
HINT: A gay satire.
Solved by Evn (comment #8).

5. A woman and a man are in bed together, the man has a leg suspended in a cast. When the woman discovers that the man isn’t really all that injured, she moans his name aloud in pleasure.
HINT: One-word title.

6. A man masturbates in the shower, meanwhile narrating the experience for the audience.
Solved by Evn (comment #2).

7. “Ah, sweet mystery of life, at last I’ve found you!”
Solved by Roberta (comment #3).

Victory in the VA Pentacle battle

This is huge.

The Bush administration has conceded that Wiccans are entitled to have the pentacle, the symbol of their faith, inscribed on government-issued memorial markers for deceased veterans, Americans United for Separation of Church and State announced today.

This settlement happened because of the persistence of Roberta Stewart, widow of slain Iraqi war veteran Patrick Stewart, and of Selena Fox, Circle Sanctuary, and of thousands of Pagans who wrote letters, signed petitions, blogged, and more. They all deserve enormous praise. I hope Ms. Stewart rests easier tonight.

Sadly, the lawsuit was settled because Americans United for Separation of Church and State was able to discover a specific pattern of discrimination against Wicca in the handling of the Pentacle petition.

Even some Pagans have kind of sneered at this case, and suggested that it was ridiculous to think it was discrimination when it was probably nothing more than beaurocracy or some failure to follow a particular rule or something equally “innocent.” The Libertarian set was quick to bitch about our litigious society and impugn the motives of those who carried this fight forward. But Americans United proved that discrimination was at the root of the problem, forcing the government to settle.

A Wiccan group first petitioned the VA for approval of the pentacle years ago. Officials at the agency dragged their feet on the request but in the interim approved the symbols of six other religions and belief systems. Among them was a Sikh emblem, which the VA approved in just a few weeks.

This is a huge and sorely needed victory for religious freedom. We see so little of the good stuff. Yay!

Monday Movie Review: Mysterious Skin

Mysterious Skin (2004) 9/10
Neil (Joseph Gordon-Levitt) and Brian (Brady Corbet) couldn’t be more different. Neil is a tough, angry, gay hustler. Brian is a nerdy and kind of goofy young man obsessed with UFOs. But their shared history draws them together.

Mysterious Skin is a movie about child molestation, make no mistake. You may see it listed as a “gay” movie, because Neil is gay, but it is not about being gay any more than it is about UFOs. Mysterious Skin is about surviving the experience of child molestation, and what it does to the children, and to the adults they become. Neil and Brian react in ways absolutely opposite of each other, and yet in ways absolutely consistent with their experience. The writers certainly did their homework. In mannerisms, memories, and attitudes, these are definitely abuse survivors. Neil is hypersexual and disregards his own safety, by the time he is eleven or twelve he has abused another child. Brian is asexual, awkward, obedient, and lives at home; he blacks out and is plagued by dreams disconnected from his spotty memories. Each boy took the tools he had available to him in response to his trauma, and built a life as best he could.

I like that Neil was already gay, and was attracted (in his eight year-old way) to his abuser, and yet the film never suggests that the abuse is somehow “about” Neil being gay. It just gives Neil a different way of processing the experience. Neil was gay before and after, but after, his sexuality became something that could only be used to gain or lose power, to give or receive pain and threat.

Joseph Gordon-Levitt is building a hell of a career. He is incredibly inward; everything happens behind his hooded eyelids, and yet he gives so much. Between this and Brick he has become an actor I want to see in everything he does.

Michelle Trachtenberg, on the other hand, lives to prove the mystery that, despite the many talented actors who can’t get work, the untalented and wooden still manage to do so. I just don’t get it.

Anyway, this is a very well-written, mostly well-acted, and kind of beautiful movie, but it is an extraordinarily painful one. It has a rape scene more brutal than anything I’ve ever seen, more disturbing, bloodier, and with Psycho earmarks all over it. I’m not ashamed to say I covered my eyes. So, not for the faint of heart, not a date movie, not a light evening of vegging out in front of the tube. But an excellent film.

Sunday Meditation: Meditation Room #2

This is part 2 of working with your meditation room. This room will become a place you can return to whenever you wish.

Ground and center.

Return to your outdoor place, and take a moment to settle there, and breathe in the peaceful beauty of it.

Now you’re ready to go to your cottage. It looks just as you remembered it. As you reach the door, you find the key in your pocket, and let yourself in.

Look around the room. You recognize it, and the sense of familiarity feels wonderful.

Your task today is to make a comfortable spot in which you will sit. It might be cushions on the floor, or a couch, or a rocking chair, or whatever you choose. Arrange the furnishings and cushions. Do you have someplace to rest your feet? Do you have a blanket to wrap yourself in? Make the colors pleasing, and the textures comfortable.

When your comfortable spot is ready, sit in it and find where your gaze rests. Now is the time to prepare a view to enjoy from your comfortable spot. Go to the closet and open it. You’ll find a painting propped up there. Take it and hang it up so that it is in view of your spot. What is it a painting of?

Return to your comfortable spot and look at the painting. What is it? What does it mean to you?

Meditate on the painting while you experience the relaxed comfort of being in this special place you have created.

In the future, you can find other paintings in the closet, and meditate on different images from your cozy seat.

When you are ready, leave the cottage, locking the door behind you and taking the key. You can return whenever you wish.

The Return of Fun With Language

I long for computers to blow up.

No, not really. But on Star Trek, when a computer dies, it dies in a shower of sparks and a satisfying array of booms and bams and puffs of smoke. Whereas in real life, when a computer dies, it just silently and unsatisfyingly goes fffft and ruins your life.

So I mentioned this to a co-worker and she says

“Oh, you should have smelled my senior project.”

There’s a phrase you rarely hear.

Carnival of Feminists #36

…is now up at Fetch My Axe. My post on Feminism and Goddess Worshp is included (w00t!)

Friday Catblogging: What’s Under the Stove?

I have no idea what’s under the stove.

Mingo seems to.
What’s under there?

And it kind of freaks me out.

P.S. Fanty runs away whenever she sees me with the camera. Never heard of a camera-shy cat before.

What the “Partial-Birth” Abortion Ban Means

I am a bit too heart-sick to write about it, but I don’t need to, because Bitch, Ph.D. said everything I would have said, but better.

Less-than-fun Language: Post-X World

So yesterday, I posted about the phrase, “In a post-Imus world,” and I think I was misunderstood. Perhaps it seemed like the post was about Imus, but I didn’t really mean that.

The Bush White House is inordinately fond of the phrase “in a post-September 11 world.” We are meant to believe that “everything is different now.” Our response to a national tragedy was manipulated to put us into an unjust and unrelated war, and to strip away our civil liberties.

The phrase is irritating not just because it’s manipulative, but because it’s short-sighted. The phrase implies that the whole world is changed. The whole world. It says we don’t need context, we don’t need history, we don’t need anything except to understand that there’s a Before, and there’s an After, and whatever standards, morals, goals, ethics, you are adhering to are Before so forget ’em.

If this creeps into our language as a snowclone, I will lose my frickin mind. Does the radio host who said “in a post-Imus world” truly believe that the very world he lives in is altered by Imus’s firing? Because fuck, I didn’t know worlds changed so easily. Or is it just incredibly lazy speech that is so annoying I almost ripped the radio out of my dashboard? I vote for the latter.

Answers to Trivia for 4/17

All solved!

» Read more..